SPSS Analsis for Corporate social performance and results description Assignment - 1

SPSS Analsis for Corporate genial performance and results description - Assignment recitationWe laughingstock adjudicate that the differences between condition Means are plausibly due to chance and non likely due to the independent variable manipulation.We now check for importee difference in the reckon social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Lavenes test is 0.163 (a value greater than 5% significance level, this involves that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we therefore assume get even variances and accustom the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.064 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the unserviceable possible action and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Means (for the employee turnover %) are likely due to chance and not li kely due to the independent variable manipulation.We now check for significance difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Lavenes test is 0.026 (a value less than 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is different we therefore assume unequal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.332 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Means (for the community spend) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation.We now check for significance difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Lavenes test is 0.578 (a value greater than 5% signi ficance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we therefore assume